admin Posted on 2:00 pm

When you’ve found the remedy to defend yourself from a fraudulent wrongful foreclosure: Stop Investigating!

“I needed a drink, I needed a lot of life insurance, I needed a vacation, I needed a house in the country. What he had was a coat, a hat, and a gun. I put them on and left the room. . “

Raymond Chandler Goodbye, my love

I have people who have contacted me over the years and for one reason or another have not fully utilized my services or have never decided what they want to do or what they can afford. Some have contacted me many times with ideas or simple advice.

I have so little time these days that while I try to help with what I know, I can only help as long as it doesn’t take up much time. I actually usually enjoy these conversations as they are people who have done a lot of research and often give me something useful.

But in general, the problem that I have with some borrowers is that they are constantly looking for the magic formula that will finally enlighten the judge. The judge will see that he has not understood the matter and that the borrower is the interested party. The only conclusion the judge can come to is that the foreclosing party never had an actual interest in the loan at closing or ever. Sounds too much like a TV show, right?

It is true that the vast majority of foreclosures are illicit and illicit. The judges of these courts start from the beginning to place the burden of proof on the borrower and that is contrary to what the constitution says about the burden of proof. It is the moving party, in this situation, which is the performing party, that must assume responsibility for proving that it has the right to bring the case to any court.

The courts want the immobilized borrower to show that they have caused no harm to the foreclosing party. However, in reality, the court has the burden of reviewing the original submissions of the foreclosing party and determining whether that party has, in fact, asserted any true and demonstrable right to collect the money from the borrower. If they have not done so, they have not met the minimum constitutional reducible requirements to appear in all courts.

Without the right to collect money, the foregoing party should not have collected any money and it follows that without the right to collect there can be no right to declare default, which would certainly nullify any right of foreclosure.

Lately, I’ve been using the strategy of challenging the position (which can be done literally at any time) of the party that forecloses right away. Without two parties with a proven interest in the issues of the case, there is no standing for the executing party and the court has no jurisdiction over the matter and should not proceed with the case.

This is the constitutional law of the United States. In this position, the court (and the judge, are interchangeable) has only one move to make. You must dismiss the case or in a non-judicial foreclosure state you must evict and vacate the wrongful foreclosure.

You may have noticed that I use the words foreclosure party and borrower instead of plaintiff and defendant. This is because in judicial foreclosure states the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the borrower is the Defendant. But, under the statute and rules of the states that use the strange and egregious non-judicial foreclosure, it ends up being the opposite. The borrower is the plaintiff and the performing party is the defendant.

That’s so confusing that I try to avoid using the words Plaintiff and Defendant when describing “who did wrong to whom.”

Below is the simplest description of the core mortgage fraud problem I have ever written. It is my answer to my friend’s questions about a type of blog that he had found on the Internet and sent me to see what he thought.

Dear Kevin,

I’m reading all the case quotes sent to me by the guy on the blog who posts videos while driving in his car and wearing sunglasses and if I get that image out of my head, he’s saying a lot of things that are close to what I am. am. It was interesting, but he’s in a niche that’s different enough that I can’t make him fit my mind. I don’t think we can find a useful way to use them in today’s environment.

The judges I have been dealing with these long seven years do not even recognize the simplest and most basic statute and constitutional civil rights. I can’t even get them to write anything in their orders and rulings to indicate that they have even read what I have written.

Kevin, time has passed for further investigation to find the magic bullet that will make the judge jump up and exclaim “Oh Kevin, now I see what you mean.”

The judge is on the road. It is an impediment to justice. We must use the remedies that the old men wrote in the constitution to slap the judges. Any reader who’s been following me this year knows that this is what I call “The Dick Butkus Mortgage Offense. If Dick Butkus is all that’s keeping you from a winning touchdown with one minute left on the clock, then you should take it out.” of the game immediately. Anyway you can. You really can’t afford to study your many obscure “what ifs” because practice ended yesterday. Now it’s Showtime.

The probably nonexistent foreclosure entity is not your problem, and neither are your attorneys. Your only opponent is the judge. He is placing the burden of proof on you, the defendant borrower. That is simply not fundamentally sound logic and it is depriving you of your civil rights. You don’t have to win the case. The case is null. You need to declare and prove that.

Just follow the laws of the subject matter jurisdiction and have the court enforce them, either peacefully or in the event a borrower starts a good loss. You are not a victim, unless you follow the rules of the judges. If you fight him and his no-rule style of court, you will be a victim and a loser.

I said it in the kindest and most courteous way. D.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *